02-08-2014, 03:52 PM
<div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font face="Arial, Verdana" size="2"><b>7) No shooting arrows from within a locality that cannot be accessed without breaking rule number 6</b></font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font face="Arial, Verdana" size="1">This rule basically makes it illegal for a player to lock themselves into a building and fire arrows at people outside, and they've done it in such a way</font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font face="Arial, Verdana" size="1">that the person they're shooting at can't get in to kill them without breaking rule 6. so the guy shooting the arrows doesnt have a way in that can be accessed</font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font face="Arial, Verdana" size="1">without mining in or placing a block or what not.</font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font face="Arial, Verdana"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="font-size: x-small; white-space: pre;"> </span><b><font size="2">7.1) This rule is not enforce when the player in question is shooting from the walls of a town in defence of a foreign aggressor who has attacked first</font></b></font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font size="1">This means that people firing arrows from a towns battlements, and have locked the gates and ways in, are exempt from rule number 7 <b>ON THE CONDITION</b> that the person they;re shooting at</font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font size="1">started the altercation by firing at the defender and or otherwise threatening or refusing reasonable demands of the defender.</font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium;"><font size="1">
</font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal;"><b><font face="Arial">Rules Regarding Land Disputes:</font></b></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><font><b>
</b></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><b>1) Land claimed by the placement of a sign or a non-substantial and contiguously occupied structure has its claim expire in 14 days if the claim in question does not meet </b></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><b>the concept of frequent and recurrent use by the claimant</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">Essentially, if someone is going to claim lands/islands anything by building a small structure or placing a sign, their legitimate</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">ownership of the claim will expire after 2 weeks unless the claim is actually put to use. I,E, building a real house that is</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">inhabited, a fort, a mine, fields or farms etc...</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">
</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>2) Application for a previously occupied land claim is to be done only after an apparent</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>14 day lapse on said claim, and is to be pursued through a formal application on the forums</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>with the claim coordinates to be arbitrated by an admin at the admin's earliest convenience.
</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>2.1) An Admin may deny any application made regarding a previously occupied land claim provided:
<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>a) the Admin has found the claim reasonably and frequently occupied</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>b) the Admin believes that such a claim is unreasonable on the grounds of the location</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>and/or distance of the claim to the parties involved</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>c) the Admin believes that the claim would level an unfair advantage for a given party</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>
</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>3) At no point can a person or party of persons modify, seize or otherwise deny access or use</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>to another person or party of persons of the latter's respective land and or territories unless the</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>territory in question has:</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>a) Been ruled by an admin to no longer be the property of the denied party</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>b) Been agreed upon by both parties regarding the rules of consensual warfare</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span> as a property at stake within the confines of the given war.</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>
</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="4"><b>CONTINUED IN NEXT POST</b></font></div><div></div><div></div><div></div>
</font></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal;"><b><font face="Arial">Rules Regarding Land Disputes:</font></b></div><div style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><font><b>
</b></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><b>1) Land claimed by the placement of a sign or a non-substantial and contiguously occupied structure has its claim expire in 14 days if the claim in question does not meet </b></font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><b>the concept of frequent and recurrent use by the claimant</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">Essentially, if someone is going to claim lands/islands anything by building a small structure or placing a sign, their legitimate</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">ownership of the claim will expire after 2 weeks unless the claim is actually put to use. I,E, building a real house that is</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">inhabited, a fort, a mine, fields or farms etc...</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="1">
</font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>2) Application for a previously occupied land claim is to be done only after an apparent</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>14 day lapse on said claim, and is to be pursued through a formal application on the forums</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>with the claim coordinates to be arbitrated by an admin at the admin's earliest convenience.
</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>2.1) An Admin may deny any application made regarding a previously occupied land claim provided:
<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>a) the Admin has found the claim reasonably and frequently occupied</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>b) the Admin believes that such a claim is unreasonable on the grounds of the location</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>and/or distance of the claim to the parties involved</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>c) the Admin believes that the claim would level an unfair advantage for a given party</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>
</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>3) At no point can a person or party of persons modify, seize or otherwise deny access or use</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>to another person or party of persons of the latter's respective land and or territories unless the</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>territory in question has:</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>a) Been ruled by an admin to no longer be the property of the denied party</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>b) Been agreed upon by both parties regarding the rules of consensual warfare</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span> as a property at stake within the confines of the given war.</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>
</b></font></div><div><font face="Arial" size="4"><b>CONTINUED IN NEXT POST</b></font></div><div></div><div></div><div></div>
